 |
Issues in Child Abuse Prevention
Number 5 Summer 1995
Update on Child Sexual Abuse
ADAM M. TOMISON
Research Fellow
CONTENTS
- Introduction
- What is Child Sexual Abuse?
- Prevalence
- The Backlash
- Perpetrators
Female Perpetrators
Child and Adolescent Sex Offenders
Homosexual Offenders
- Causes of Child Sexual Assault
- Suspected Child Sexual Abuse and Occurrence of Domestic Violence
- Ritual Abuse: The 'New' Sexual Abuse
- Prevention
Community Education
Education Programs
A Future Role for Schools in Prevention
Offender Treatment Programs
Adolescent Offender Programs
- Conclusion
- References
INTRODUCTION
Child sexual abuse is an old phenomenon (Plummer 1993). The sexual exploitation
of children - males and females - has occurred throughout history (Tower
1989), yet it was not until the 16th century that legislation was enacted
in England that began the process of protecting children from sexual abuse:
boys were protected from forced sodomy, and girls under the age of ten
years from forcible rape. By the time of the settlement of the United
States, sexual prohibitions were becoming more stringent (Oates 1990).
Illick (1974 as cited in Oates 1990) reported that in Conneticut in 1672,
a father was found guilty of incestuous acts with his daughter and executed.
The case also exemplified an attitude still encountered today: victim
blaming. In the Conneticut case this resulted in the child being sentenced
to a whipping for her part in the crime.
In the 1700s some educators began warning parents to supervise their
children at all times, and to ensure they were never nude in front of
other adults, in order to protect them from sexual abuse. This constituted
one of the first indications that society at large recognised the potential
for children to be sexually abused (Conte and Shore 1982). By the late
1900s welfare groups were familiar with child sexual abuse, and that its
most common form was intrafamilial assault (Wurtele and Miller- Perrin
1992). However, by the 1920s sexual abuse had become characterised as
extrafamilial assault, committed by 'strangers', with the victim perceived
as being a 'temptress' rather than an innocent child (Gordon 1990, as
cited in Wurtele and Miller-Perrin 1992).
Societies continued to turn a 'blind eye' to child sexual abuse until
after the 're-discovery' of child maltreatment in the early 1960s by Kempe
and his colleagues in the United States (Kempe, Silverman, Steele, Droegemuller
and Silver 1962). Kempe's construction of the 'battered child syndrome'
has been expanded extensively over the past three decades to encompass
sexual abuse, emotional abuse and neglect. The continuing growth of concern
about child sexual abuse is frequently attributed to child advocates and
the feminist movement (Reppucci and Haugaard 1993). This greater awareness
grew particularly out of the latter's work as advocates for adult victims/survivors
of rape and other sexual assault.
Why wasn't child sexual abuse widely identified prior to the 1960s? As
Oates (1990) states, while society could cope with 'stranger danger' and
the threat of the stereotypical child molester assaulting children, it
was much more threatening to acknowledge that sexual abuse was commonly
occurring within the family, committed by family members upon whom children
were dependent and should have been able to trust. The acknowledgement
of sexual abuse was therefore a threat to the structure of the family.
It has been contended that some researchers, for example Kinsey and associates
(1953, as cited in Goddard and Carew 1993) 'minimised' or played down
the sexual abuse of children because they felt society had not reached
a point where it was able to acknowledge intrafamilial sexual abuse.
In any discussion of child sexual abuse it should be recognised that
there may be interest groups that believe that there are benefits for
children in having sexual relationships with adults (Tower 1989; Korbin
1990). Enmore (1986, as cited by Goddard and Carew 1993) asserted that
arguments used by such groups to gain rights for those who engage in,
or wish to engage in sexual relationships with children are similar to
those used to assist the gay rights movement. That is, they claim that
their activities are normal, human and valuable experiences. The proponents
of 'child love' assert that children are not always traumatised by a sexual
relationship which may enable them to 'satisfy instinctual drives . .
. [or] to test in reality an infantile fantasy . . . [where the child's]
emotional balance is . . . in favour of contentment' (Bender and Blau
1937, as cited in DeYoung 1982:46).
One of the more convincing arguments against this view has been presented
by Finkelhor (1984) who asserted that modern society is based upon the
idea of free will and the ability to consent: true consent is only possible
if one has knowledge and authority, and Finkelhor contended that children
lack both.
Occupying a position of less personal power and control in comparison
with adults (Korbin 1990), children have no authority in a legal or psychological
sense. Moreover, they lack 'knowledge of the meanings of sexuality, information
to enable them to anticipate the direction of the sexual relationship,
or any idea of how others will react to their sexual involvement' (Tower
1989:103).
This paper discusses some of the current issues of child sexual abuse,
including perpetrator characteristics, the 'backlash' against child sexual
abuse, ritual abuse and sexual abuse prevention initiatives.
Back
to Top
WHAT IS CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE
As was indicated in the last National Child Protection Clearing House
Issues paper (Tomison 1995a), there are problems in arriving at concrete
definitions of child abuse and neglect, and child sexual abuse is no exception.
Kempe and Kempe's (1978) definition, based on Schechter and Roberge's
(1976) work, has been widely used. They defined child sexual abuse as:
'The involvement of dependent, developmentally immature children and adolescents
in sexual activities which they do not fully comprehend, are unable to
give informed consent to and that violate social taboos of family roles'.
(1978:60)
The importance of the definition lies in the acknowledgment of the limitations
of children to give truly informed consent. The Australian Institute of
Health and Welfare provides a useful national definition of child sexual
abuse: 'Sexual abuse is any act which exposes a child to, or involves
a child in, sexual processes beyond his or her understanding or contrary
to accepted community standards' (Angus and Woodward 1995:46).
As Goddard and Carew (1993) note, child sexual abuse commonly refers
to the abuse of children by the extended family (or non-family members);
often this abuse stops short of actual intercourse. Incest on the other
hand has become progressively more constrained, to the extent that it
refers specifically to the societal taboo of intercourse between immediate
family members.
In this paper child sexual abuse will be used as a term to describe all
types of sexually abusive behaviour, regardless of whether that abuse
involves incestuous acts.
Put simply, child sexual abuse is the use of a child for sexual gratification
by an adult or significantly older child/adolescent (Tower 1989). It may
involve activities ranging from exposing the child to sexually explicit
materials or behaviours, taking visual images of the child for pornographic
purposes, touching, fondling and/or masturbation of the child, having
the child touch, fondle or masturbate the abuser, oral sex performed by
the child, or on the child by the abuser, and anal or vaginal penetration
of the child. Sexual abuse has been documented as occurring on children
of all ages and both sexes, and is committed predominantly by men, who
are commonly members of the child's family, family friends or other trusted
adults in positions of authority.
Child sexual abuse has been further classified by some academics and
practitioners as sexual exploitation, which involves touching the child
and/or compelling the child to observe, or be involved in other sexual
activity (for example, watching pornographic videos); sexual assault,
molestation, victimisation, and child rape. Finkelhor (1979) argued against
the term sexual assault and sexual abuse because he felt they implied
physical violence which, it was contended, was often not the case (see
the discussion on sexual abuse and domestic violence below). Finkelhor
favoured the term sexual victimisation in order to underscore that children
become victims of sexual abuse as a result of their age, naivete and relationship
with the abusive adult.
In contrast, a recent Victorian Parliamentary Crime Prevention Committee
report on child sexual abuse (1995) recommended that child sexual abuse
be referred to as 'child sexual assault' rather than by terms such as
'harm', 'injury', or 'abuse'. The term 'child sexual assault' would highlight
the true nature of the offence, avoid minimisation of the abusive acts,
and compel or force the 'abuse' to be considered as a criminal assault
and treated as such from the beginning of any investigation of the abusive
concerns. For these reasons the term 'child sexual assault' will be used
throughout this paper.
PREVALENCE
Finkelhor (1984) estimated the proportion of children in the United States
that were exposed to some form of sexual abuse was between 9 and 52 per
cent for females and between 3 and 9 per cent for males (depending on
the definition of sexual abuse and methodology used). It is also clear
that the majority of perpetrators of sexual abuse are men, and that the
victims are predominantly female (Finkelhor 1979). In the latest Australian
national statistics of the prevalence of child sexual abuse, 19 per cent
of 28,711 substantiated cases were labelled as sexual abuse (Angus and
Woodward 1995); 74 per cent of cases involved female victims.
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander families were significantly over-
represented in the national sample. However, within the Aboriginal and
Torres Strait Islander sample, a significantly lower proportion of cases
were classified as sexual abuse (11 per cent) in comparison with the national
sample. Based on substantiated cases reported by the various state child
protection services, the rate of sexual abuse for the nation was 1.1 per
1000 children aged 0-16 years. Despite the comparatively low number of
sexual abuse cases in the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population
the rate of sexual abuse for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander families
was 2.0 per 1000 children aged 0-16 years, an indication of the over-representation
of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander families in the national child
abuse statistics.
There has been a significant increase in the recognition of child sexual
assault (Leventhal 1990), which has been reflected by a substantial increase
in the number of reports made to child protection services across Australia
and overseas, particularly in the last five years. However, until 1995,
the substantiation rate of cases had not increased proportionately. Thus
more cases were being reported, but higher numbers of cases were not being
substantiated. In 1995, only 44 per cent of all finalised child maltreatment
cases were substantiated (Angus and Woodward 1995). The increase in child
maltreatment reports is attributed to the introduction of mandatory reporting
of child sexual abuse across most states and territories, and the much
greater public awareness of the problem (Clark 1995).
Back
to Top
THE BACKLASH
The substantial increases in sexual abuse reports and investigations
across the western world (Myers 1994), have been accompanied by the formation
of an 'opposition' to child sexual assault investigations and the child
protection system. In 1988 Hechler published an account of efforts designed
to raise community awareness of the child sexual abuse problem, and focused
on a counter-movement which he termed the 'backlash' ' said to be comprised
mainly of aggrieved parents or professionals who have been investigated
as possible offenders and feel unfairly treated or stigmatised (Finkelhor
1994).
The backlash counter-movement focused on what was perceived as the overzealous
investigation of alleged sexual abuse, criticising inadequacies in the
current child protection services. Put simply, backlash supporters believe
there has been an epidemic of sexual abuse accusations rather than an
epidemic of actual sexual abuse. The backlash has gained some credence
as a result of well-publicised, controversial, multiple victim child sexual
abuse cases, such as Cleveland or the Orkneys in the United Kingdom, which
have affected the public perception of child protection services' competency
(Myers 1994). Some of their more constructive recommendations have been
better training for child protection workers, and the adequate provision
of services to marginally dysfunctional families rather than an overly
intrusive protective intervention (Wimberly 1990, as cited in Myers 1994).
PERPETRATORS
Traditionally, studies have indicated that almost all sexual abusers
have been men (Leventhal 1990). However a consistent profile of child
sex abusers has not emerged (Oates 1990). To date work with perpetrators
and research studies have failed to typify offenders by class, profession,
wealth or family status (Willis 1993). Similarly, there has been no clear
delineation between perpetrators and non-perpetrators in terms of race
or religion (Wurtele and Miller-Perrin 1993); neither has a psychological
profile of a typical offender been able to be constructed - perpetrators
of child sex assault 'constitute a markedly heterogeneous group' (Wurtele
and Miller-Perrin 1993:16).
Because of this heterogeneity, typological frameworks have been constructed
in order to provide homogenous sub-groups of offenders (Wurtele and Miller-Perrin
1993), the intention being to elucidate why offenders abuse by focusing
on who abuses. Offenders have been divided into a number of overlapping
categories - one of the most- frequently used being exclusive versus non-exclusive
attraction to children.
This is also known as 'fixated' versus 'regressed' paedophilia respectively
(Groth, Hobson and Gary 1982, as cited in Wurtele and Miller-Perrin 1993),
and is allied with Howells' (1991, as cited in Willis 1993) typology of
the 'preferential' sex offender versus the 'situational' offender, where
the former refers to offenders predisposed to seek sexual gratification
from children, while the latter is more closely allied with family-based
offenders, many of whom are not primarily sexually aroused by children.
Other typologies have been: extrafamilial versus familial victims; violent
versus non-violent assaults; pre-pubertal versus post-pubertal victims;
same-sex versus opposite-sex victims, commonly referred to as homosexual
and heterosexual sexual assault (Friedman 1991); multiple victims versus
single victim. The most resistant to changing his behaviour would be an
offender predisposed to the first of each paired factors. That is, offenders
exclusively attracted to violent sexual acts with children, particularly
extrafamilial, pre-pubertal, same-sex victims (Hobson and Bunk 1987, as
cited in Friedman 1991). These offenders can be classified as what the
general public would define stereotypically as 'paedophiles'.
Research has shown that each of these crude categories is unreliable
because of the extensive overlap of various behaviours by offenders (Willis
1993). Willis (1993) proposed a more accurate model based on previous
categorisations such that offenders are classified according to their
preferences on three scales: fixated versus regressed paedophilia, preferential
versus situational offending, and homosexual versus heterosexual offending.
In this model those more strongly associated with the first term of each
factor would more closely resemble a 'paedophile' profile, while those
regressed, situational, heterosexual offenders would be more likely to
be intrafamilial offenders, and may be more accessible to changing his
abusive behaviour (Willis 1993).
Overall, Wurtele and Miller-Perrin (1993) note that: '[Given] that the
vast majority of typological studies are conducted with samples of offenders
who are convicted, hospitalised, or receiving psychotherapy, the obtained
findings may be seriously affected by reporting and judicial biases (Howells
1981) . . . The only common denominators appear to be an offender's lack
of sensitivity to the child's wishes and needs, along with a willingness
to exploit the child's trust for the abuser's own gratification, profit,
or selfish purposes.' (1993:20)
Despite the fact that children are significantly more likely to be abused
by a family member or friend of the family, the general public perception
of sexual abusers is that of the 'dirty old man' and the so- called 'stranger-danger'.
The following sections outline some non- stereotypic offender sub-groups
which are currently generating interest in the child abuse community.
Female Perpetrators
As mentioned above, most child sex offenders are male. However some studies
have indicated females sexually abuse also. For example, Leventhal (1990)
noted that in the 1986 United States national yearly report of child sexual
abuse only 82 per cent of offenders were male. Leventhal posited that
this may be because women who failed to protect their child from sexual
abuse were included with those who actually committed sexually abusive
acts. In a review of the evidence for female sex abusers, Finkelhor and
Russell (1984) concluded that females do abuse in a small proportion of
cases: approximately 5 per cent of cases with female victims, and 20 per
cent in cases involving males.
Often women who do sexually abuse children do so at the instigation or
encouragement of male abusers (Adams-Tucker 1982, as cited by Wurtele
and Miller-Perrin 1993; Faller 1987). Others argue that the prevalence
of female sexual abusers is an under-estimation because of a general unwillingness
to believe that women also commit sexually abusive acts (Banning 1989,
as cited in Wurtele and Miller-Perrin 1993).
Estimating the true incidence of female abusers is further hampered by
the failure of most child abuse statistical reports to provide a gender
breakdown of sexual abuse perpetrators. The majority of such reports classify
abusers according to their relationship to the victim - 'parent', 'blood
relative', 'family friend' (Angus and Woodward, 1995; Tomison, 1994).
Irrespective of the difficulty in obtaining a clear picture of the incidence
of female abusers, research to date has failed to demonstrate that large
numbers of women sexually abuse children (Wurtele and Miller-Perrin 1993)
- with two notable exceptions: perpetrators of sexual abuse in day care
centres, and abusers who form part of a child sex ring or group involved
in the ritual or organised sexual abuse of children.
With regard to the former, women make up the vast proportion of workers
who staff day care centres, enhancing the potential to detect women engaging
in sexually abusive behaviour independent of male involvement. Kelley
(1994) reviewed the literature and reported that in three major United
States studies, women were identified as perpetrators of sexual abuse
in 40-55 per cent of sexual abuse cases.
In the latter case, Lanning (1991) reported that in an analysis of several
hundred 'mulitdimensional sex rings' approximately 40-50 per cent of perpetrators
were identified as women (see ritual abuse section).
These findings contrast with the feminist theory of child sexual assault
(see cause of child sexual assault section), which is based on the assumption
that sexual assault occurs as a result of gender inequality in society,
with sexual abuse existing as one part of a range of violence perpetrated
by males (O'Hagan 1989). Identification of female abusers may support
an argument that sexual assault occurs as a result of a general power
imbalance, rather than as a result of a purely gender- based dominance
pattern.
Child and adolescent sex offenders
That children and adolescents may commit acts of sexual abuse is a relatively
recent discovery, occurring years after identification of adult perpetrators
(Vizard, Monck and Misch 1995). The recent Victorian Parliamentary Crime
Prevention Committee report (1995) noted that practitioners had reported
that adolescents displaying the early signs of sex offending tended to
grow up and commit sex offences unless they were provided with treatment.
The need to break the cycle of offending at an early stage was echoed
by many professionals and highlights the targeting of young sex offenders
as a special population. According to the Children's Protection Society
(1995), the literature on adolescent sex offenders has unanimously concluded
that the professional community must 'work to identify and treat child
(and adolescent) perpetrators and not deny the potential risks to themselves
and the community' (Johnson 1988, as cited in Children's Protection Society
1995:14).
Like adult perpetrators, young offenders comprise a heterogeneous group
(Vizard, Monck and Misch 1995) with few broad characteristics. Perhaps
one of the most widely reported is a history of sexual abuse and/or other
maltreatment. While the 'majority of male children who are sexually assaulted
do not become sexual offenders' (Becker 1988:195), the rate of sexual
victimisation for young offenders is estimated to be between 30 and 70
per cent (Watkins and Bentovim 1992).
Published studies of the incidence or prevalence of child and adolescent
sex offenders are rare, and they suffer from the same definitional and
methodological issues that plague child abuse and neglect studies as a
whole. The National Children's Home (1992, as cited in Masson 1995) reported
that it is estimated that between one-quarter to one-third of sexual abuse
cases in England are perpetrated by a young sexual offender. Overall,
1 per cent of sex offences in Britain are currently attributed to adolescent
females - the ratio of male to female perpetrators is given as 100:1 for
offenders aged 14-20 years and over 20 years (Vizard, Monck and Misch
1995).
'Homosexual' Offenders
The stereotypic 'paedophile' can be classified as being more likely to
be an extrafamilial, preferential offender who indulges in same-sex or
'homosexual' offending (Willis 1993). The basic societal assumption is
that paedophiles who sexually abuse same-sex children are members of the
homosexual community (King 1994). That is, there is no qualitative difference
between a homosexual man who engages in sexual behaviour with another
adult male, and a male who engages in sexual behaviour with a boy. As
recently as 1995 this perception has resulted in moves by the Victorian
Government to enact a special clause in the new Victorian Equal Opportunity
Act 1995 allowing employers to discriminate against homosexuals (gay men
and lesbians) who apply for jobs which involve the supervision, care or
instruction of children (Stewart 1995). Yet the supposed link between
homosexuality and paedophilia, and the assumption that paedophiles have
come from the gay community is not backed up by evidence.
An offender's sexual orientation, whether he perceives himself to be
homosexual, bisexual or heterosexual, is not mentioned as a risk factor,
indicator, or characteristic in typologies of child sex offenders (Finkelhor,
Williams, Burns and Kalinowski 1988; Wurtele and Miller-Perrin 1993).
Offender typologies account for same-sex sexual abuse purely on the biological
sex of the victim and offender, regardless of self-reported sexual orientation.
Willis noted that the attempt to classify offenders as 'homosexual' and
'heterosexual' involved 'crude categories [that were] very unreliable
given the extensive overlap of the [offender's] behaviour' (1993:20).
Willis also reported that 'substantial numbers of non-familial child molesters
do not display or report deviant sexual preferences' (1993:22). That is,
many offenders offend against both male and female children, defying strict
classification on the basis of sexual orientation. In addition, Willis
indicated that many offenders do not have any outward signs of so- called
'deviant' sexual behaviour, such as homosexuality.
Summit (1990) stated that male child molesters tend to cultivate adult
female partners regardless of whether they engage in same-sex or opposite-sex
offending behaviour. Despite a lack of references to support this claim,
it is one of the few statements specifically referring to 'homosexual'
offending and the link to heterosexual (adult-adult) sexual behaviour.
In a national study of child sexual assault in day care centres in the
United States, Finkelhor, Williams, Burns and Kalinowski (1988) found
that males were disproportionately represented as sexual abusers despite
accounting for only 5 per cent of staff. Yet Finkelhor's group found no
offender characteristics which would distinguish the abusers from other
staff or people generally. It was specifically reported that stereotypic
paedophile characteristics were notably absent. Finkelhor and colleagues
made recommendations for the screening of all applicants for day care
positions, but did not specify an individual's sexual orientation as a
risk factor. A more recent review of studies of sexual abuse in day care
also made no reference to offender's sexual orientation as a risk factor
(Kelley 1994).
In a discussion paper focused on men's role in primary education, King
(1994) found that there was no evidence of a relationship between homosexual
male teachers and paedophile activity. Newton (1978) found that homosexual
teachers were no more likely to engage in same-sex sexual abuse than were
heterosexual teachers. In a study of child sexual abuse by clergy, Camargo
and Loftus (1992) found that there was a clear distinction in terms of
masculinity and femininity factors between clergy who were active homosexuals
(adult-adult), and those engaged in same- sex paedophile activity.
In their classic study aimed at determining sexual behaviour and orientation
in the community, Kinsey and colleagues (1948, as cited in DiLapi 1989),
found that crimes such as child sexual assault had been historically incorrectly
attributed to homosexuals and that, if anything, heterosexual males were
more likely to be involved in sexual abuse. Despite methodological flaws,
and what has been charitably described as a 'minimisation' of the negative
effects that sexual abuse has on child victims (Finkelhor 1979), this
study was one of the few to attempt to define the prevalence of homosexuals
as offenders in cases of child sexual abuse (Freund and Watson 1992).
Finally, studies of offender arousal patterns have indicated that paedophiles
and homosexuals have different patterns of response (Freund and Watson
1992), with paedophiles not surprisingly being more aroused by images
of children. Overall, what little evidence there is, although flawed,
appears to indicate that sexual orientation does not play a part in child
sexual assault typologies, and that the assumption that paedophiles who
engage in same-sex sexual abuse are homosexuals is more a societal myth
than a reality.
Back
to Top
Causes of Child Sexual Assault
Why then, does child sexual assault occur? O'Hagan (1989) has summarised
the two major theoretical perspectives for what has been one of the more
significant controversies in the child maltreatment field (Goddard and
Hiller 1993). The family therapy view posits that child sexual abuse occurs
as a result of 'family dysfunction'. Also known as a family dysfunction
model, the emphasis is on the role of sexual abuse as a means of maintaining
equilibrium within the family system. Thus each family member would be
seen as having an interest in the continuation of the abuse (O'Hagan 1989).
In contrast, feminist theorists view child sexual abuse from a sociological
rather than a familial perspective (Tower 1989), considering the sexual
assault of children as an outcome of societal values. According to this
view, women and children have inferior social status under the current
patriarchal social structure and are subject to male dominance. Using
such a 'social power' framework, sexual abuse is seen merely as one part
of the range of violence perpetrated by men against women and children
(O'Hagan 1989).
Finkelhor (1984) has contributed to an understanding of why sexual abuse
may occur by proposing a four-part model - all of which, it is posited,
must occur for abuse of a child by an adult to eventuate:
- A potential offender must have some motivation to sexually abuse a
child. The potential offender must feel some form of emotional congruence
with the child, sexual arousal with the child must be a potential source
of gratification, and alternative sources of gratification must be unavailable
or less satisfying.
- Any internal inhibitions against acting on the motivation to engage
in sexual assault must be overcome. For example, alcohol or drugs may
be used in order to lower inhibitions against sexual offending. This
may be combined with the knowledge that society often shows greater
tolerance towards those who commit crimes while under the influence
of substances (Goddard and Carew 1993).
- Any external impediments to acting on the impulse to abuse must be
overcome. Inadequate care or supervision by a parent or guardian can
provide an opportunity for an offender to act.
- Avoidance or resistance by the child must be overcome. This may involve
enticing an emotionally deprived child into accepting inappropriate
attention, or overt coercion to achieve domination of the relatively
powerless child.
Finkelhor noted a number of risk factors which may increase the likelihood
of sexual offending, specifically by overcoming internal inhibitions or
external impediments to offending. These included: maternal illness or
absence (providing greater opportunity for father-daughter incest); overcrowding
and the concomitant lack of privacy which may lead to less inhibitions;
unemployment and family stress; or emotional deprivation in the child
who may then be more open to accepting inappropriate 'affection' from
an adult. Adults suffering from sexual role confusion, sexual frustration,
and/or the need to dominate a child as a means of self-assurance/power,
may also have an increased potential to offend against children. Finally,
as previously mentioned, would-be abusers may use alcohol or drugs in
order to overcome inhibitions towards sexual offending.
To date there is a paucity of hard evidence to support either Finkelhor's
model or the risk factors (Oates 1990). Oates believes that this can be
used as an indication that child sexual abuse is a complicated phenomenon,
with no simple solutions. Goddard and Carew (1993) contended that Finkelhor's
model indicated more about how sexual abuse occurs rather than why it
occurs. They argued that in order to understand sexual abuse, like other
forms of child maltreatment, it is necessary to categorise and separate
the various types of sexually abusive behaviour, given that different
causative factors may be operating for each 'type' of abuse.
Back
to Top
SUSPECTED CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE AND OCCURRENCE OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
In the late 1980s research began to be produced which provided support
for the feminist assertion of a link between sexual and physical assault.
There is a growing body of evidence to suggest that different types of
violence may occur simultaneously within a family (Stanley and Goddard
1993; McKay 1994), but until relatively recently the link between violence
in a family and child sexual abuse was not widely investigated. Two Australian
studies, Goddard and Hiller (1993) and Tomison (1994) examined the possibility
of a relationship between child sexual abuse and domestic violence.
Using data from a hospital-based child abuse case tracking study (Hiller,
Goddard and Diemer 1989), Goddard and Hiller (1993) reported that 40 per
cent of identified sexual abuse cases and 55 per cent of identified physical
abuse cases were occurring in families where domestic violence was also
evident. Tomison (1994) reported on the results of a large-scale tracking
of suspected child abuse and neglect cases within a Victorian regional
child protection network. In Tomison's study approximately 16 per cent
of cases identified as sexual abuse reportedly occurred in families where
one or both of the child's caregivers was verbally and/or physically violent
to each other, compared with approximately 28 per cent of physical abuse
cases. While the relative proportion of sexual and physical abuse cases
reported to be occurring in families where domestic violence was a factor
was higher in the Goddard and Hiller study, the overall trend was similar.
Both studies indicated that domestic violence was a factor in a sizeable
proportion of both child sexual and physical abuse cases.
Taking domestic violence as an overt expression of male domination and/or
male power in the family unit, it can be argued that the abuse of children
has occurred within a coercive environment. Yet the extent of such coercive
forces impacting on children is possibly far greater than what would be
expected from taking only the overt signs of domestic violence into account.
First, many child protection workers failed to determine whether even
overt verbal and physical domestic violence was occurring in the family
(Tomison 1994). Second, the measure of the extent of coercion and/or male
domination in the family that Tomison and Goddard and Hiller (1993) employed
does not take into account the effects of the less overt forms of aggression
that can exist (Goddard and Hiller 1993), nor does it specifically incorporate
the actual physical violence that can be used as a coercive force against
children.
For example, in Tomison's (1994) study, 19.4 per cent of child sexual
abuse cases (24 of 124) also involved the child being physically abused;
17 per cent of these cases (4 of 24) were reported to be occurring in
families not identified by professionals as violent. This would seem to
provide support for the contention that workers were taking a conservative
approach to identifying family violence, and that the measure of coercion
used in this paper is both conservative and an underestimate of the true
level of coercion operating in these families.
The data from this study, and from that of Hiller, Goddard and Diemer
(1989 as cited by Goddard and Hiller 1993), suggests that a violent, coercive
environment may be almost as likely for sexual abuse cases as it is for
physical abuse cases, particularly with the more severe cases of physical
and sexual abuse. Child sexual abuse may, like child physical abuse, occur
as a function of the misuse of personal power, and is another example
of male attempts to control others through the use of violence. As Goddard
and Hiller (1993:27) note: 'The point, crudely stated, is this: children
having witnessed the beating of their mothers need no further reminder
of the possible consequences of their resistance to the wishes of their
fathers (or, indeed, of older males in general).'
The research reported here did not allow for a test of the 'family dysfunction'
theory of child sexual abuse. However, the results do provide at least
some support for the feminist contention that child sexual abuse exists
as a function of the gender imbalance of power in family structures. It
would also appear to provide further support for the view that workers
professionally involved in this area should give greater consideration
to the implications of domestic violence, and the implications for child
abuse.
Back
to Top
RITUAL ABUSE: THE 'NEW' SEXUAL ABUSE
In the 1980s reports began to appear in the literature of a new form
of sexual abuse: ritual abuse - a dimension that has created significant
confusion and controversy. Since its 'discovery' serious questions have
been raised as to whether ritual abuse exists at all (Lanning 1991; LaFontaine
1994). Lanning concluded that: '[after] all the hype and hysteria is put
aside, the realisation sets in that most satanic or occult activity involves
the commission of no crimes, and that which does, usually involves the
commission of relatively minor crimes' (1991:144).
Such arguments are based predominantly on the lack of physical evidence
associated with alleged cases of ritual abuse, and come mainly from those
involved in the criminal justice system. The possibility of ritual abuse
remains open, with many professionals involved in child protection or
welfare services maintaining a belief in the existence of ritual abuse,
despite a lack of consensus among professionals as to what actually constitutes
such maltreatment. This paper will proceed on the basis that there is
a possibility of ritual abuse.
Ritual abuse has been described in a number of ways (Lewandowski 1995):
some link ritual abuse with satanic practices (Young 1991), while others
differentiate between satanic rituals and other forms of rituals (Lanning
1991). To add to the confusion, the terms 'satanic', 'occult' and 'ritualistic'
abuse are often used interchangeably (Lanning 1991).
Finkelhor, Williams and Burns (1988:59) defined ritual abuse as 'abuse
that occurs in the context linked to some symbols or group activities
that have a magical or supernatural connotation, and where the invocation
of these symbols or activities are repeated over time and are used to
frighten and intimidate the children'. They suggested three sub-types
of ritual abuse: 'true cult based', where sexual abuse is merely one component
of the child's involvement in a religious cult's activities; 'pseudo-ritualistic',
where sexual abuse is the primary aim and rituals or cult activities are
secondary; and 'psychopathological ritualism', where mentally disturbed
adults employ idiosyncratic rituals while abusing their children.
Investigators in the criminal justice system (Lanning 1991; Hopley 1994)
and some academics/practitioners (Goddard 1994a) choose to encompass ritual
or satanic abuse under the more general category 'organised' abuse or
'multidimensional child sex ring'. Law enforcement officers appear to
favour the term 'multidimensional child sex ring' because not all ritualistic
activity is spiritually motivated, nor is all ritualistic activity satanic
in nature (Lanning 1991).
Organised abuse can be defined as 'sexual abuse where there [is] more
than a single abuser and the adults concerned appear to have acted in
concert to abuse the children and/or where an adult has used an institutional
framework or position of authority to recruit children for sexual abuse'
(LaFontaine 1994:3)
A common occurrence in cases of alleged ritual abuse has been a lack
of physical evidence to substantiate charges of such maltreatment. This
has reportedly affected the public's trust in law enforcement and child
protection services to adequately manage/investigate allegations; it has
also made it difficult to substantiate allegations of ritual abuse (Myers
1994; Lewandowski 1995). In addition, well-publicised cases of alleged
ritual abuse which have been perceived as being mishandled, such as the
Orkney Islands case in the United Kingdom, or the Oude Pekela cases in
Norway (Myers 1994) have certainly proved useful material for the backlash
movement (Lanning 1991).
Lanning (1991) believes that the lack of physical evidence may be due
to a number of factors. 'Pathological distortion' by the victims may occur
as a result of mental disorder or attention-seeking (for example, Munchausen's
syndrome). 'Traumatic memory' may result where fear and severe trauma
have distorted reality and led to some confusion as to what happened,
in severe cases this may be represented by a dissociative disorder (previously
known as multiple personality disorder).
According to Lanning (1991) the most popular explanation for the lack
of evidence pertaining to ritual abuse cases is the perpetrator's use
of 'misperception, confusion or trickery'. Some perpetrators may deliberately
introduce satanic or occult activity into sexual offending in order to
obfuscate what has occurred, which may be achieved through the use of
drugs, magic, or costumes. In addition, investigators of ritual abuse
often unreasonably expect a child to accurately describe sexual behaviours
for which they have little frame of reference. Thus the child's inability
to comprehend what has happened may also hinder the gathering of physical
evidence. Lanning also noted that 'overzealous interveners' may inadvertently
contaminate a child's disclosure.
LaFontaine (1994) presented another possible explanation for the disclosures
of ritual abuse by some children. She assessed a number of ritual abuse
cases as part of her evaluation of the extent of ritual and organised
abuse in the United Kingdom. She contended that the caregivers of some
difficult children, or professionals that were involved with the children,
may have sought 'ritualistic' or 'bizarre' explanations with which to
justify the children's behaviour. That is, the caregivers and social workers
may have assumed that a child's 'acting out' was due to some horrendous
experience, rather than to some other, mundane factor. LaFontaine posited
that some caregivers may also have inadvertently coached or recorded information
disclosed by the child in a biased fashion, highlighting the more bizarre
aspects.
It has been claimed that some ritual abuse/multidimensional child sex
ring cases have not been successfully prosecuted because there has not
been a vigorous investigation of the ritualised aspects of the case (Lanning
1991). Goddard (1994b) reported that a United Kingdom social service department
dealt with ritual abuse cases in a manner similar to other sexual abuse
cases - that is, the case was defined as sexual abuse, albeit with ritualised
aspects.
The investigation and subsequent legal action taken were handled on this
basis, with the case being run purely on the direct evidence of sexual
abuse that could be gathered. Lanning (1991) advocates such an approach.
Also in support of this approach, Goddard noted the potential to lose
sight of abusive concerns if inaccurate labels are applied to abuse. Using
the sexual and physical abuse of children by teachers as an example, he
stated that '[such cases] should not be described as 'educational' abuse
because it is perpetrated by a teacher, or because it took place in a
classroom' (1994a:38). Under this argument, alleged ritualised or satanic
sexual abuse should not be defined as ritual abuse, but rather as sexual
abuse with ritualised aspects and dealt with accordingly.
Back
to Top
PREVENTION
Child sexual assault prevention programs must target victimisation, sexually
abusive behaviour and the changing of community attitudes which allow
the sexual abuse of children to occur' (Crime Prevention Committee 1995:265).
The following sections detail some of the currently operating prevention
programs and some possible future directions.
Community Education
Wurtele and Miller-Perrin (1992) contended that child sexual assault
is ultimately the responsibility of every citizen. In order to encourage
society as a whole to acknowledge the problem and to educate them about
it, community education has been undertaken in most countries. In the
past decade it has been argued that the western world has achieved a much
greater recognition of the problem of child sexual assault. The significant
increase in the number of cases reported to child protection services
has been taken as some support for this contention (Clark 1995). Media
campaigns (radio, print media and television) have attempted to enhance
public awareness. Media presentations have helped to 'demystify and reduce
the secrecy surrounding child sexual abuse' (Wurtele and Miller-Perrin
1992:200).
While the general public is aware of the child sexual assault problem,
Oates (1990) contended that the public does not have a balanced view of
the area, and that there is a need for a community education campaign
to enhance people's knowledge.
Following a similar argument, Wurtele and Miller-Perrin (1992) contended
that in the future media should be better used, targeting perpetrators,
victims, and parents with more detailed information about seeking help,
where to obtain assistance. They also suggest the use of actors to role-play
realistic scenarios on television.
This suggestion was recently advocated in Australia by McGurk (1995).
He referred to the success of hard-hitting advertising campaigns to discourage
drunk driving and driving without seatbelts. The advertisements illustrate
the unacceptable and undesirable nature of such behaviour and present
the consequences of such behaviour very explicitly (graphic car accidents).
McGurk believes that such an approach would be useful for the secondary
and tertiary prevention of family violence. He advocated a trial media
campaign explicitly portraying family violence, with the intention of
confronting 'perpetrators with the grossness, grotesqueness and total
unacceptability of their behaviour. For victims, the campaign would be
directed at encouraging them to come out of the cupboard' (McGurk 1995:
11).
It is contended that such an approach could also be adapted for a child
sexual assault campaign, and may represent a way forward as a means to
combat child sexual assault.
Education programs
Currently the major school-based primary prevention initiatives are personal
safety and protective behaviours programs. Personal safety programs have
the aim of educating school-age children to protect themselves from sexual
abuse. Protective behaviour programs focus on teaching children to avoid
a wide range of potentially unsafe situations, only some of which involve
child maltreatment. The programs attempt to involve the children's parents
in the program in order to raise community awareness of sexual abuse and
to teach parenting skills related to protecting their children and detecting
signs of abuse (Plummer 1993).
School-based prevention programs are designed to reduce the incidence
of sexual abuse by preventing the occurrence of some of Finkelhor's (1984)
four preconditions for sexual offending. The aim of the programs is to
educate children about what constitutes inappropriate sexual advances
or behaviour and how to deal with such advances (Plummer 1993).
The intention of protective behaviour/personal safety programs is to
educate children, not to make them solely responsible for their own safety
(Plummer 1993). The most common and consistent positive outcomes of such
programs have been children's heightened knowledge of sexual abuse, increased
child disclosures of abuse (Plummer 1993; Reppucci and Haugaard 1993),
and an improvement in parental awareness and ability to protect their
children (Plummer 1993).
Plummer (1993) contended that by 1990, as a result of the child sexual
abuse backlash, child abuse prevention initiatives began to be judged
more harshly. Major criticisms of school-based programs have been that
they may not be tailored for the specific ages of the target children
(especially younger children), that they are methodologically problematic,
ineffectively evaluated, and emphasise the child protecting her/himself,
with a reliance on an overly complex method of repelling an advance (Plummer
1993; Reppucci and Haugaard 1993).
In her first audit of the National Child Protection Clearing House prevention
programs and research databases, James (1994) found that despite a general
acceptance that rigorous evaluation was an essential part of all prevention
programs, very few effective evaluations had been done in Australia. A
'rigorous' evaluation was defined as one designed as a 'true experiment'
(Fink and McCloskey 1990), involving pre- and post-test models, and/or
matched control and experimental samples. The overall intention was to
evaluate programs with large sample sizes over time, enhancing the potential
for future replication.
James (1994) concluded that, with a few exceptions, no systematic research
had preceded the implementation of many primary and secondary prevention
programs (including personal safety/protective behaviours programs); and
that often overseas programs had been adapted for use in Australia without
any investigation into the needs of the community for which the program
was intended.
However, Tomison's (1995b) audit of the National Child Protection Clearing
House databases indicated a greater implementation of rigorous evaluations
of prevention programs. Approximately 25 per cent of personal safety/protective
behaviour programs on the databases were identified as attempting to conduct
'rigorous' evaluations. It was concluded that professionals and organisations
working in the child abuse prevention field had to some extent acted to
rectify the lack of quality evaluations in Australia outlined by James
(1994) in the first audit of the NCH Prevention Programs and Research
databases.
Despite attempts to effectively evaluate protective behaviours and personal
safety programs, few would be able to fulfil the methodological requirements
of James (1994). If program success is measured in terms of an increase
in the reporting of sexual abuse by children, and enhanced knowledge of
sexual abuse and preventative actions, then personal safety and protective
behaviours programs can be described as successful. If however, strict
evaluation criteria are employed which require evidence of the prevention
of child sexual abuse, then current programs fail to meet the set standards.
Overall, such programs were not designed to place responsibility on children
to protect themselves, merely to aid them in identifying potentially abusive
situations (Plummer 1993). Under such an assumption school-based prevention
programs have achieved some positive results.
A future role for schools in prevention
In support of personal safety/protective behaviour programs, a major
thrust of the Victorian Crime Prevention Committee's (1995) approach to
child sexual assault prevention was the enhancement of current educational
programs running in primary and secondary schools. It was the Committee's
view that the education system should take more responsibility for the
production of capable, functioning members of society. This responsibility
would involve running compulsory protective behaviours programs in schools
(as occurs in South Australia) and the uniform teaching of life skills.
According to the Committee, the latter should address the following issues:
criminal law, victim empathy, gender and socialisation, sexual education,
sexual assault, child abuse, violence, domestic violence, and alcohol/drug
use.
Such an approach is currently advocated by a number of professional and
community groups across the nation, and reflects a growing perception
that education should not be limited to purely academic subjects (Cohn
1990, as cited in Oates 1990). Under this approach, education is strongly
involved in preparing young people to function in society, rather than
working to educate on a purely academic agenda.
Offender treatment programs
'The community must accept that incarceration in, and of itself, will
not achieve a single thing, other than the protection of the community
for that time which an offender is incarcerated' (Crime Prevention Committee
1995:230). The small proportion of offenders who are convicted and sentenced
to imprisonment will be returned to society, while the majority of offenders
are never imprisoned (Crime Prevention Committee 1995). The prevention
of child sexual assault is discussed in terms of an ideal model for managing
child sexual assault proposed by Victoria's Crime Prevention Committee
(1995).
Assessments of sex offender recidivism indicate that, without treatment,
approximately 60-70 per cent of sex offenders will re-offend, while less
than half of sex offenders who undergo a treatment program reportedly
re-offend (Crime Prevention Committee 1995). Cost/benefit analysis has
indicated that the treatment of offenders is a cost-effective approach
to the problem of child sexual assault, given that it appears to lead
to much lower recidivism rates, while the costs of treatment are far outweighed
by the costs of incarcerating recidivists in addition to the social and
human cost of the assaults themselves (Prentky and Burgess 1990).
Based on national and international evidence, the Crime Prevention Committee
(1995) proposed a model of offender treatment which would involve a mandatory
assessment of all convicted sex offenders sentenced to a custodial or
non-custodial sentence. Following assessment, offenders would commence
an extensive treatment program which would continue on until the offender's
parole period has expired. It was acknowledged in the report that an offender's
progress through the treatment program could be used as an assessment
tool by parole boards who may have concerns about granting parole to a
sex offender who has refused treatment, or who has made unsatisfactory
progress through the treatment system.
Adolescent offender programs
As mentioned previously, the professional child maltreatment community
recognises the need to intervene with young sex offenders, or potential
offenders (Children's Protection Society 1995). Studies of adult sex offenders
in the United States indicated that many begin sexually deviant behaviour
from the age of eight upwards (Groth, Longo and McFadin 1982, as cited
in Children's Protection Society 1995). Honey Knopp (1982) reported that
early intervention is paramount in order to more easily disrupt deviant
behavioural patterns; young people are still experimenting with a variety
of sexual patterns, thus providing alternatives to offending behaviour;
distorted or inappropriate cognitive patterns are less deeply entrenched
and can be re-directed; and young people are better candidates to learn
new, acceptable social skills. In summary, it is easier to prevent further
abusive behaviour in offenders where the behaviour has not become a deeply
ingrained pattern.
The Victorian Crime Prevention Committee (1995) recommended that all
adjudicated adolescent sex offenders undergo assessment and appropriate
treatment. Rather than using the criminal justice system as a means to
ensure that young offenders receive mandatory assessment and treatment,
the Committee proposed extending the grounds under which a protection
application may be made under state legislation. The new grounds would
allow applications to be taken out for children displaying the 'early
signs of sexually offending behaviour', and would enable an appropriate
assessment and treatment program to be instituted under the supervision
of specialist child protection staff.
In the Committee's view, the potential benefits of such a system would
be the adequate treatment and prevention of sexual assaults by young offenders.
The proposed model also provides an answer to an ongoing debate within
the professional community as to whether diversion (from the criminal
justice system) or prosecution should be the preferred option for young
offenders (Masson 1995). The Committee's proposal allows for mandated
treatment, but avoids the necessity of having to go through the criminal
courts by widening the criteria for protection applications.
An additional positive side-effect of the program may be an adequate
investigation as to why a child had begun acting out in such a way - that
is, a determination of who, if anyone, may have been sexually assaulting
the child victim/offender.
Back
to Top
CONCLUSION
The enormity of the child sexual abuse problem has been described as
'one of the most discouraging discoveries of our era' (Finkelhor 1990:394).
Despite society's reluctance to acknowledge what can be a major source
of suffering for young people (Tower 1989), there has been progress, particularly
in the last decade, in the identification, treatment and prevention of
child sexual abuse.
This paper has been an attempt to describe some of the current issues
in child sexual abuse research and practice. It is by no means an exhaustive
review of the area, but highlights aspects of sexual assault which appear
to have successfully penetrated society's attempts to keep sexual abuse
at arm's length. The intention has been to redress some of the stereotypic
assumptions characteristic of child sexual assault and sexual assault
perpetrators, while offering some possible solutions for the decade to
come.
REFERENCES
Angus, G. & Woodward, S. (1995), 'Child abuse and neglect Australia
1993-94', Child Welfare Series No. 13, Australian Institute of Health
and Welfare, AGPS, Canberra.
Becker, J.V. (1988), 'The effects of child sexual abuse on adolescent
sexual offenders', in G.E. Wyatt and G.J. Powell (eds) Lasting Effects
of Child Sexual Abuse, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, California.
Camargo, R.J. and Loftus, J.A. (1992), 'Child sexual abuse among troubled
clergy: a descriptive summary', Paper presented at the Annual Convention
of the American Psychological Association, 100th, Washington DC, August
14-18 1992.
Children's Protection Society (1995), Adolescent Sex Offender Treatment
Program, Children's Protection Society, Melbourne.
Clark, R. (1995), 'Child Protection Services in Victoria', Family Matters,
no.40, Autumn, Australian Institute of Family Studies, Melbourne.
Conte, J. & Shore, D. (1982), 'Social work and sexual abuse', Journal
of Social Work and Human Sexuality, vol. 1, no.1-2, Haworth Press, New
York.
Crime Prevention Committee, Parliament of Victoria (1995), Combating
Child Sexual Assault: An Integrated Model, First Report, LV North, Government
Printer, Melbourne.
DeYoung, M. (1982), The Sexual Victimization of Children, McFarland,
Jefferson, NC.
DiLapi, E.M. (1989), 'Lesbian mothers and the motherhood hierarchy',
in F.W. Bozett (ed.) Homosexuality and the Family, Haworth Press, Binghamton,
NY.
Faller, K.C. (1987), 'Women who sexually abuse children', Violence and
Victims, vol.12, no.4.
Fink, A. & McCloskey, L. (1990), 'Moving child abuse and neglect
prevention programs forward: improving program evaluations', Child Abuse
and Neglect, vol.14, pp.187-206.
Finkelhor, D. (1979), Sexually Victimized Children, The Free Press, New
York.
Finkelhor, D. (1984), Child Sexual Abuse: New Theory and Research, The
Free Press, New York.
Finkelhor, D. (1990), 'New ideas in child sexual abuse prevention', in
R.K. Oates (ed.) Understanding and Managing Child Sexual Abuse, Harcourt
Brace Jovanovich, Sydney.
Finkelhor, D. (1994), Ch.2 in Myers, J.E.B. (ed.), The Backlash: Child
Protection Under Fire, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California.
Finkelhor, D. and Russell, D.E.H. (1984), 'Women as perpetrators', in
D. Finkelhor, Child Sexual Abuse: New Theory and Research, The Free Press,
New York.
Finkelhor, D., Williams, L.M., Burns, N. (1988), Nursery Crimes: Sexual
Abuse in Day Care, Sage Publications, Newbury Park.
Finkelhor, D., Williams, L.M., Burns, N. and Kalinowski, M. (1988), Sexual
Abuse in Day Care: A National Study, Executive Summary, Family Research
Laboratory, Durham, NH.
Freund, K, and Watson, R.J. (1992), 'The proportions of heterosexual
and homosexual paedophiles among sex offenders against children: an exploratory
study', Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, vol.18, no. 1, pp.34-43.
Friedman, S. (1991), Outpatient Treatment of Child Molesters, Professional
Resource Exchange Inc, Sarasota, Florida.
Goddard, C.R. (1994a), 'The organised abuse of children in rural England:
the response of social services: part one', Children Australia, vol.19,
no.3, pp.37-40.
Goddard, C.R. (1994b), 'The organised abuse of children in rural England:
the response of social services: part two', Children Australia, vol.19,
no.4, pp.49-51.
Goddard, C.R. & Carew, R. (1993), Responding to Children: Child Welfare
Practice, Longman Cheshire, Melbourne.
Goddard, C.R. & Hiller, P.C. (1993), 'Child sexual abuse: assault
in a violent context', Australian Journal of Social Issues, vol.28, no.1,
pp.20-33, February.
Hechler, D. (1988), The Battle and the Backlash: The Child Sexual Abuse
War, Lexington Books, Lexington, Mass.
Hiller, P.C., Goddard, C.R. & Diemer, K.M. (1989), 'The nature of
and institutional reaction to child abuse: continuities and discontinuities
in the comparative analysis of cases of physical and sexual abuse', in
Proceedings of the Second Annual Conference of the Victorian Society for
the Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect: Twelve Months On: Achievements
and Future Directions, pp.111-134, Vicspcan, Melbourne.
Honey Knopp, F. (1985), The Youthful Sex Offender: The Rationale and
Goals of Early Intervention and Treatment, Safer Society Press, Vermont.
Hopley, I.D. (1994), Advances in Combating Child Sexual Abuse in Victoria,
Victoria Police, Melbourne.
James, M. (1994), National Child Protection Clearing House Newsletter,
vol.2, no.1, National Child Protection Clearing House, Canberra.
Kelley, S.J. (1994), 'Abuse of children in day care centres: characteristics
and consequences', Child Abuse Review, vol.3, pp.15-25.
Kempe, C.H., Silverman, F.N., Steele, B.F., Droegemuller, W. and Silver
(1962), 'The battered child syndrome', Journal of the American Medical
Association, vol.18, no.1, pp.17-24.
Kempe, R.S. & Kempe, C.H. (1978), Child Abuse, Fontana/Open Books,
London.
King, J.R (1994), Uncommon Caring: Primary Males and Implicit Judgements,
EDRS, Florida.
Korbin, J.E. (1990), 'Child sexual abuse: a cross-cultural view', in
R.K. Oates (ed.) Understanding and Managing Child Sexual Abuse, Harcourt
Brace Jovanovich, Sydney.
LaFontaine, J. (1994), The Extent and Nature of Organised and Ritual
Abuse, HMSO, London.
Lanning, K. (1991), 'A law enforcement perspective on allegations of
ritual abuse', in D.K. Sakheim and S.E. Devine (eds) Out of Darkness:
Exploring Satanism and Ritual Abuse, Lexington Books, New York.
Leventhal, J.M. (1990), 'Epidemiology of child sexual abuse', in R.K.
Oates (ed.), Understanding and Managing Child Sexual Abuse, Harcourt Brace
Jovanovich, Sydney.
Lewandowski, C.A. (1995), 'A comparison of protective service workers'
perceptions of ritual and sexual abuse in children: an exploratory study',
Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, vol.4, no.2, pp.67-81.
Masson, H. (1995), 'Children and adolescents who sexually abuse other
children: response to an emerging problem', Journal of Social Welfare
and Family Law, vol.17, no.3.
McGurk, H. (1995), 'Children and domestic violence: keeping it in the
family', Paper presented at the First National Conference on Children
and Domestic Violence, Adelaide, 30 November 1995.
McKay, M.M. (1994), 'The link between domestic violence and child abuse:
assessment and treatment considerations', Child Welfare, vol.73, no.1,
pp.29-39, January/February.
Myers, J.E.B. (1994), 'Definition and origins of the backlash', in Myers,
J.E.B. (ed.), The Backlash: Child Protection Under Fire, Sage Publications,
Thousand Oaks, California.
Newton, D.E. (1978), 'Homosexual behaviour and child molestation: a review
of the evidence', Adolescence, vol.13, no. 49, pp.29-43.
Oates, R.K. (1990), 'Understanding the problem', in R.K. Oates (ed.)
Understanding and Managing Child Sexual Abuse, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich,
Sydney.
O'Hagan, K. (1989), Working with Child Sexual Abuse: A Post-Cleveland
Guide to Effective Principles and Practice, Open University Press, Milton-
Keynes.
Plummer, C.A. (1993), 'Prevention is appropriate, prevention is successful',
in R.J. Gelles and D. R. Loseke (eds) Current Controversies on Family
Violence, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, California.
Prentky, R. and Burgess, A. (1990), 'Rehabilitation of child molesters:
a cost-benefit analysis', American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, vol.60,
no.1, pp.108-117.
Reppucci, N.D. and Haugaard, J.J. (1993), 'Problems with child sexual
abuse prevention programs', in R.J. Gelles and D. R. Loseke (eds) Current
Controversies on Family Violence, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, California.
Stanley, J.R. & Goddard, C.R. (1993), 'The association between child
abuse and other family violence', Australian Social Work, vol.46, no.2,
pp.3-8, June.
Stewart, M. (1995), 'Except for you . . . and you . . . and you', Alternative
Law Journal, vol.20, no.4, pp.196-197.
Summit, R.C. (1990), 'The specific vulnerability of children', in R.K.
Oates (ed.), Understanding and Managing Child Sexual Abuse, Harcourt Brace
Jovanovich, Sydney.
Tomison, A.M. (1994), An Evaluation of Child Abuse Decision Making in
the Barwon Region: A Report for the Victorian Health Promotion Foundation,
Volumes I & II, Department of Social Work and Human Services, Monash
University, Melbourne.
Tomison, A.M. (1995a), Spotlight on Child Neglect, Issues Paper No.4,
National Child Protection Clearing House, Australian Institute of Family
Studies, Melbourne.
Tomison, A.M. (1995b), 'The current state of child abuse prevention programs
in Australia: an analysis of the National Child Protection Clearing House
databases', Paper presented at the Fifth Australasian Conference on Child
Abuse and Neglect, October 17-19, Melbourne.
Tower, C.C. (1989), Understanding Child Abuse and Neglect, Allyn &
Bacon, Boston.
Vizard, E., Monck, E. & Misch, P. (1995), 'Child and adolescent sex
abuse perpetrators: a review of the research literature', Journal of Child
Psychology and Psychiatry, vol.36, no.5, pp.731-756.
Watkins, B. & Bentovim, A. (1992), 'The sexual abuse of male children
and adolescents: a review of current research', Journal of Child Psychology
and Psychiatry, vol.33, pp.197-248.
Willis, G.C. (1993), Unspeakable Crimes: Prevention Work with Perpetrators
of Child Sexual Abuse, The Childrens Society, London.
Wurtele, S.K. & Miller-Perrin, C.L. (1993), Preventing Child Sexual
Abuse: Sharing the Responsibility, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.
Young, W.C. (1991), 'Patients reporting ritual abuse in childhood: a
clinical syndrome: report of 37 cases', Child Abuse and Neglect, vol.15,
no.3, pp.181-189.
Back
to Top
© Australian Institute of Family Studies - Commonwealth of Australia 1995.
Written by: Adam M. Tomison
Coordinator: Judy Adams
Designed by: Double Jay Graphic Design
Printed by: Impact Printing
ISBN 0 642 22916 3
ISSN 1321-2540
|
© National Child Protection Clearinghouse
c/- Australian Institute of Family Studies, 300 Queen Street,
Melbourne Vic 3000.
Tel: (03) 9214 7888. Fax: (03) 9214 7839. http://www.aifs.gov.au
|
|
|
 |