Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
Dr
Helen Durham of the Australian Red Cross calls for Australian ratification
of the Rome Statute to establish an International Criminal Court.
Progress
is being made towards the establishment of an International Criminal
Court (ICC). The Australian Government has announced plans to introduce
legislation to ratify the ICC. The Joint Standing Committee on Treaties,
a federal parliamentary body, has been taking written and oral submissions
relating to this proposed international legal institution.
The proposed ICC is a major step forward for international humanitarian
law, and brings the world closer to ending impunity for those accused
of committing atrocities. The ICC will be established after 60 states
have ratified the Rome Statute for the International Criminal Court,
which was agreed upon in July 1998. So far 29 states have ratified
it.
The Court will be located in The Hague, in the Netherlands, with
links to the United Nations. It will have the power to try individuals
who are believed to have committed genocide, crimes against humanity
and war crimes. The crime of aggression will also be included in
the ICC statute after further work has been done to create a clear
legal definition of this crime.
Whilst the Court cannot ensure an end to the horrors that are committed
throughout the world, it must be seen as a giant step in the right
direction towards peace and international justice. As Mr Yves Sandoz,
Head of the International Committee of the Red Cross delegation
stated only hours after the ICC Statute was approved: The
Statute that has just been adopted offers States an extraordinary
opportunity, at the dawn of the 21st century, to unite in defending
fundamental values and to give true meaning to the concept of international
community - I hope they will take it.
The topic under consideration is extremely important to the Australian
Red Cross (ARC), which has the responsibility for educating the
public on international humanitarian law (often called the laws
of war) and in the last few years has held over 100 seminars, talks,
training sessions and conferences on topics including the International
Criminal Court. Well over 40,000 people from all walks of life have
attended these events and specifically expressed interest in the
creation of a new institution to try those accused of atrocities.
In a submission to the Joint Standing Committee on Treaties, the
ARC stated that educators in the area of international humanitarian
law find it impossible to talk about the laws of war without questions
being raised on methods of enforcing this area of law. Once the
concept and the Statute of the ICC is explained in a clear and concise
manner, the response from the public is very positive. In particular,
the fact that the ICC will not detract from Australias capacity
to try its own people, but rather will add an extra, and in most
instances optional, layer to the process, is of great interest to
the public. The recent overwhelming pride felt by Australia in relation
to the actions taken in restoring security and peace in East Timor,
and the concern expressed by many members of the public at the possibility
of the presence of alleged war criminals in Australia, demonstrate
that the Australian public has a strong commitment to international
justice.
The ARC believes that the ICC is not only viable but an essential
step towards international justice. The United Nations has considered
the idea of establishing a permanent international criminal court
at various times since the end of the Second World War. The creation
of the Statute of the ICC was the culmination of years of effort
and indicates the resolve of the international community to ensure
that those who commit grave crimes do not go unpunished.
The Australian Government played a role at all levels of the negotiations
to create the Statute. The ARC was represented in the International
Committee of the Red Cross delegation at the Rome Conference and,
as a National Society within the Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement,
has noted that Australians are interested to engage in international
legal issues and are especially concerned about matters of justice.
International lawyers within the ARC have been discussing the issue
of ratification with other National Societies, such as British Red
Cross, and sharing positive views and opinions on the best way to
create suitable domestic legislation to ratify the Rome Statute.
The ICC will not impact upon national sovereignty as Australia will
have fully formed domestic legislation to allow the prosecution
of Australian suspects within this country. As a nation with a commitment
to human rights and the dignity of all people, it is in Australias
interest to ratify the ICC.
The establishment of the International Criminal Court is a
gift of hope to future generations, and a giant step forwards in
the march towards universal human rights and the rule of law. It
is an achievement which, only a few years ago, nobody would have
thought possible - Kofi Annan.
What
can the court do?
Its
various divisions can
-
investigate and prosecute relevant crime
-
try those who have been charged
-
hear appeals
-
pass sentences.
Who
will appoint the judges?
-
The parties to the statue (states) will elect judges from those
who would be eligible for the judiciary in their own countries
and having appropriate experience in criminal law.
Who
can be tried?
-
citizens of ratifying countries or countries giving consent for
a particular crime or situation
-
people who have committed crimes in these countries.
What
crimes are included?
-
genocide
-
crimes against humanity
-
war crimes
-
the crime of aggression (still to be defined)
These
include:
- the
taking of hostages
-
torture
-
enslavement
-
deportation or forcible transfer of population
-
the enforced disappearance of persons
-
imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty in
violation of fundamental rules of international law
-
rape
-
sexual slavery
-
enforced prostitution
-
forced pregnancy
-
enforced sterilization
-
persecution against any identifiable political, racial, national,
ethnic, cultural, religious group or gender
-
and all serious breaches of the Geneva Convention.
What
sentences can be handed down?
-
imprisonment for up to 30 years
-
life imprisonment in extreme cases
-
in addition to imprisonment, the Court may order:
-
a fine
-
forfeiture of proceeds, property and assets derived from the crime.
Can
past crimes be tried?
- No,
only crimes committed after the establishment of the court, or
after the relevant countrys ratification of the Statute,
whichever is the later.
|